Features · Pro

Analytics that tell you what actually moved the needle

Most fitness apps hand you a wall of charts and leave you to guess. MuscleBuddy's Pro analytics do the reading for you: which lifts are climbing and which have stalled, whether more volume is helping or hurting your recovery, how your calories track against the scale, and how your bloodwork moves over time — each answer computed from a rule you can check, with a plain-language summary on top.

Correlational analytics — what drives what

The hard question in training isn't "what happened" — it's "what caused it." MuscleBuddy pairs your logged data across time and reports the relationship, not just the two lines. Does more weekly volume actually lift your recovery score, or drag it down? Is your top-set strength tracking with how recovered you feel? On the nutrition side: are your calories moving the scale the direction you want, and is protein doing its job?

Each finding comes with a direction (positive, negative, none), a strength (negligible through strong), and the sample size it's drawn from — "based on 12 weeks of data" — so you know how much to trust it. When there aren't enough paired days yet, it says so plainly rather than inventing a trend. Nothing here is a black box: the same data always yields the same read.

The Lift Report, per lift — with a summary in plain English

Every lift you train gets its own report: an estimated-1RM trend line (Epley, from the sets you actually logged), the rate it's moving in kg or lb per week, its last PR date, and a status — progressing, flat, or stalled. A stalled lift is flagged with how long it's been stuck and the exact rule that flagged it, so you can act instead of squinting at a graph.

Above the per-lift breakdown sits a short, plain-language summary of the whole picture — where you're gaining, what's stuck, what to look at next. It's orientation, not new data: every number it mentions is already computed and shown below it. It fails soft, so a busy moment for the model just hides the summary and leaves the hard numbers intact.

Volume balance, heatmap, and multi-metric trends

A weekly volume heatmap paints your body — front and back — by how much work each muscle group is getting, so an under-trained area or a lagging side is obvious at a glance instead of buried in a spreadsheet. Each muscle carries a status against your target, the same per-muscle view that drives your ranks and that coaches read during a program review.

The Trends view overlays the metrics that usually move together — bodyweight, calories, recovery score, and more — on one timeline, so you can see a cut, a bulk, or a fatigue spike as it develops instead of after the fact. Pick the metrics you care about; the overlay does the rest.

Bloodwork, recovery, and nutrition outcomes over time

Log a lab panel and each marker trends against its own reference range, so you watch a value move toward or away from where it should be across months, not just read a single snapshot. It turns bloodwork from a one-off number into a line you can act on.

Recovery and nutrition get the same treatment as full correlational views: recovery score against training volume and against top-set strength, and calories and protein against your actual bodyweight change. Between them, the guesswork about whether your current approach is working comes off the table — the data says which way it's going.

Frequently asked

Is analytics free, or part of Pro?
The analytics suite — the Lift Report, volume heatmap, Trends, correlational recovery and nutrition views, bloodwork trends, and the plain-language summary — is a Pro feature. The ranks, leaderboards, and basic charts you see day to day are free; Pro adds the deep read of your own data.
Is the AI making the numbers up?
No. Every trend, rate, correlation, and status is computed by a deterministic rule from the sets, meals, weigh-ins, check-ins, and labs you logged — the same inputs always give the same output. AI is used only to write the plain-language summary on top; it describes the numbers, it never invents them.
How much do I need to log before analytics is useful?
It scales with your data. A few working sets start the Lift Report; correlational views need enough paired days to be trustworthy and will tell you when they are not there yet — typically a few weeks of consistent logging. Bloodwork trends want two or more panels over time.
What does a correlation strength actually mean?
Each finding reports a direction (positive, negative, or none), a magnitude (negligible, weak, moderate, or strong), and the number of weeks it is drawn from. A strong signal over many weeks is worth acting on; a weak one over a handful is flagged as exactly that, so you are never over-reading noise.
Can my coach see all this?
Yes. The same per-lift, per-muscle, and outcome views inform a coach during a program review, so decisions about where volume goes are grounded in your real training rather than a hunch.

Stop guessing what worked

Pro turns the data you're already logging into answers: what's climbing, what's stalled, and what actually drives it. Start free, upgrade when you want the deep read.